Interview with Paul Egan: Medical Design Innovation in 3D printing

blank

Dr. Paul Egan is a tenure-track assistant professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Texas Tech University and leads the Medicine, Mechanics, and Manufacturing Design (M3D) Lab. The M3D Lab investigates a unique integration of engineering design methods for system modeling, optimization, and experimentation of diverse biomedical systems using computational design and additive manufacturing approaches. Research applications focus on 3D printing for tissue scaffolds, personalized nutrition, prosthetics, and medical devices. Dr. Egan’s engineering design teachings promote mechanical design innovation for positive societal impacts, which aligns with Dr. Egan’s leadership in entrepreneurial activities and medical technology start-ups. Professor Egan will be a speaker at the upcoming virtual event focusing on Design for Medical 3D Printing.

When was the first encounter you had with 3D printing?

Paul: My first experience with 3D printing began with my post-doctoral appointment in 2014. At this
time, the technology was beginning to gain momentum for more practical use in research and
provided an opportunity to automate the fabrication of real-world designs optimized through
the support of computational design processes.

What inspired you to start your journey?

Paul: My inspiration for 3D printing, particularly in health applications, is to leverage innovations in
computational design to create physical systems that improve human health, particularly those
that are personalized for individual user needs.

Who inspired you the most along this journey?

Paul: I have had numerous mentors inspire me throughout my journey towards 3D printing in
medicine. The greatest mentors are those that are open-minded and facilitative, while also
challenging and encouraging better work in others.

What motivates you the most for your work?

Paul: I am highly motivated by the potential impact of my research work to improve human health,
while also contributing novel ideas that drive fundamental knowledge of science and
engineering forward.

What is/are the biggest obstacle(s) in your line of work? If you have conquered them, what were your solutions?

Paul: In interdisciplinary work, obstacles always exist to gaining acceptance and working with
others across fields. An essential aspect of success is building a network and relationships with
other experts open to cross-disciplinary collaborations that may require more
work to understand one another’s perspectives but have great potential for innovations.

What do you think is (are) the biggest challenge(s) in 3D Printing/bio-printing? What do you think the potential solution(s) is (are)?

Paul: A big practical challenge in bio-printing is the creation of patient-specific solutions for systems
with heterogeneous organizations, such as heart replacements for organ transplants. Potential
solutions will require coordination across different fields of science and engineering, especially
for understanding and controlling different emergent behaviors among system components.

If you are granted three wishes by a higher being, what would they be?

Paul: Some wishes at the top of the list are more time, health, and happiness.

What advice would you give to a smart driven college student in the “real world”? What bad advice have you heard they should ignore?

Paul: Some good advice for driven college students is to balance your aspirations and passions with
what is practically achievable. Advice that is not so helpful tends to be generalized
across all students while not appreciating the context of each student’s unique situation.

What’s your favorite book you read this year and why? Alternatively, what’s your favorite book of all times you read and why?

Paul: One of my favorite books of all time is I am a Strange Loop in addition to other works by Douglas
Hofstadter
. His works provide a unique perspective linking philosophy, computation, and
science, providing deep insights to understanding and improving the world around us.

Interview with Elissa Ross: Mathematics Behind Metafold 3D

Interview with Jade Myers: Designing 3D Printed Prosthetics

Design for 3D Printed Medical Devices (On Demand Video)

Designing and Equipping 3D Bioprinting Facilities

Robert Pugliese: Design for Healthcare with 3DPrinting (Podcast)

Virtual Reality Software For Molecular Modeling and Structure-Based Drug Design

blank

Life Is A Poker Game, President Trump’s Healthcare Agenda

All content of this email is for entertainment purposes and not investment advice. All the news we share via social media can be found here. To subscribe to this email, click here. Alternatively, we also have a LinkedIn version of this newsletter. All past issues are here. This edition includes insights, news, and events.

Subscribe here to receive the newsletter via email earlier than others.

What makes a decision great is not that it has a great outcome. A great decision is the result of a good process, and that process must include an attempt to accurately represent our own state of knowledge. That state of knowledge, in turn, is some variation of ‘I’m not sure’.” ― Annie Duke, Thinking in Bets: Making Smarter Decisions When You Don’t Have All the Facts

Dear Gentle Readers,

Maybe you don’t need people to tell you this, but I found Annie Duke’s insight clarifying, “Life is poker, not chess.” In a poker game, results are determined by both luck and skills, unlike chess, where the ability to strategize (skills) matters 100%. Many erroneously think that if we have done the work or followed the steps, we should be able to attain specific results. If the expected results are not there, the problem must be the process or steps we took (a.k.a. “resulting”). A lot of us hate the world of “gambling”, even though our daily life decisions force us to make many bets.

This newsletter is being delivered late due to my lack of skills and not lack of luck. I have added “Time Management for Dummies” to my list to read in December, so there is hope. The silver lining of procrastination is that I discovered the world of Annie Duke, a world-class poker player (gambler), psychologist, and excellent author. I highly recommend all the books she wrote, particularly “Thinking in Bets.” At the least, you can show off your skills at the poker table this holiday season.

Joking aside, we now have a new president on the horizon. Mr. Trump’s pending presidency has excited the whole world. Some are very happy with the result, others are not. Some maintain a “let’s see” attitude. However, I think democracy in the United States, the process, has worked. The results may not make some happy, but it is unlikely the process’ fault. We should probably keep it.

We have heard much speculation about how the Trump administration will impact world trade, immigration, tax, and social policies, but how would the new administration specifically impact healthcare 3D printing?

I am no policy buff, but government policies matter in healthcare and elsewhere.

If we break things down, “healthcare 3D printing” contains three identities: emerging technology, life science/healthcare, and manufacturing. Looking at these three sectors separately, we could get a potential forecast for the future. Also, in general, the more uncertainties (i.e. risks) there are, the lower a company’s valuation will be. Again, this is not professional or investment advice, but just some ideas I could bet on.

1. Manufacturing

Interestingly, in August, Xometry published a survey of 150 manufacturing executives in the US, and the majority (55%) backed Mr. Trump over Kamala (38%). Granted, this is a small sample size with limited data, but this data is perhaps more reflective of the sentiment among businesses relevant to the additive manufacturing sector.  More specifically, as better described in this article, these are potential significant impact areas: a) Restitution or expansion of tariff, b) Incentives for domestic manufacturing, c) Tax policy reform, d) Regulatory reform, and e) trade agreement and supply chain realignment.

Given improved cash flow from tax cuts, I hope to see an increase in R&D in the US AM industry in the short term. Still, I am concerned about the potential rising cost of raw materials/imported parts and an even more challenging labor market where AM talents are hard to find domestically already.  Of course, you have different issues/benefits if you are outside the US.

2. Life science/healthcare -“Make America healthy again”

A wild card, indeed. Currently, even the most informed can only speculate. This poker game is on.

Most believe the outcome will be a mixed bag regarding how it will impact the healthcare pharma industry. PwC’s summary suggests these four areas are worth attention to 1) Deregulation. 2) Flexibility and choice 3) Accessibility 4) National security.

The most important questions for the 3DHEALS readers could be:

  1. How will these policy reversals or changes impact medical device reimbursement or biologic therapeutics?
  2. How will the new proposal pay for itself?
  3. How will these impact the merger and acquisition landscape in 3D printing?
  4. How will these impact foreign startups aiming for the US medical/pharma markets?

3. Emerging technology

Some of the most vocal advocates for Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign this time around were the most influential entrepreneurs and venture capitalists who are big fans of:

AI + Crypto +Tiktok

Okay, not 3D printing. We are also a tiny industry.

But how will the same three topics, deregulation, immigration, and tariff, impact us?  While VC-funded startups may have an easier environment for exits, according to this article, less than 1% of the startups ever get VC funding. Worst of all, few lawmakers, perhaps even know what we do or only have a rudimentary understanding of the current value and future potentials of 3D printing in healthcare and everywhere else.

With a limited government budget, will there be enough non-diluted R&D and industry-specific funding for the sector?   Will new immigration laws make it difficult or impossible for foreign founders to immigrate to the US (since the US has one of the best environments for healthcare startups)? Will companies be able to keep the existing workforce at an affordable rate?  Few can claim today that they know how and what changes will occur in January 2025.

Still, as French microbiologist and chemist Louis Pasteur said, “In the fields of observation, chance favors only the prepared mind.”

“In the fields of observation, chance favors only the prepared mind.”–French microbiologist and chemist Louis Pasteur

Hola!  3DHEALS Instagram Account:

We are back online after some serendipitous help from our 3DHEALS tribe. You can now see our channel again.

blank

While we are not giving up on Instagram entirely (and those of you who work there, please help), this unfortunate event has motivated us to direct our attention to our YouTube channel, where we create new content regularly.

Jenny Chen, M.D.

Events/Community 🗓️

Now On-Demand:

3D Printing for Orthotics and Prosthetics. A week ago, we successfully concluded our event focusing on 3D printing (and 3D technologies in general) in the orthotics and prosthetics industry. This is one of the most critical topics that defines our vision and achievements in healthcare 3D printing, and therefore 3DHEALS events revisit this annually. For our 2024 version, our unique expert panel covered almost every body part in the O&P industry. The speakers included clinicians, industrialists, marketers, and startup founders. Each speaker brought their unique journeys (often measured in decades), perspectives, and wishlist to the conversation. What is also worth mentioning was our audience for the live event. Our analytics dashboard showed surprisingly strong results from India, Denmark, and Canada, in addition to our US audience, among 40+ countries. We also had one of the highest percentages of clinicians signed up for the event, 15%, as opposed to typically less than 10%. (Your prosthetists care! )The beauty of the 3DHEALS panel is that it is a mix of structured education in a relatively short period (15 minutes or so) and organic reactions and conversations among the audience. I want to thank all of the speakers, as well as a very engaging audience, for participating in this event. This blog contains my thoughts after the event. Frankly, I felt out-of-date during the virtual event because there were so many advancements since I last reviewed the industry. This blog contains my opinions, which are not necessarily the truth, and I am open to critiques.

Mark your calendar:

Design for 3D printing and Bioprinting Check out the upcoming 2025 3DHEALS events calendar.

Podcast(“The Lattice”):

If you are an auditory learner, you can now find recordings of some of the latest virtual events. We are working on a series of new podcasts as well. Stay tuned.

Partner Survey:

Point of Care 3D printing by Dr. Neha Sharma “We’re thrilled to invite you to participate in a unique global survey on Point-of-Care (POC) 3D print labs! This survey, initiated by University Hospital Basel, Switzerland and MGA Mobility | MGA Medical – Mobility goes Additive e.V., aims to capture essential insights into the infrastructure, challenges, and best practices defining the future of POC 3D printing in healthcare.” Here is the survey link. Want to get our updates more promptly? Here is our subscription link.

News 📰amp; Thoughts

Core Legal Challenges for Medical 3D Printing in the EU This publication by legal experts dissects the problem with MDR regulation into four quadrants: premarket approval, post market liability, intellectual properties, personal data protection. Worth a read if you are interested in the EU medtech market. Pitch3D welcomes EU founders to apply.

Revolutionizing surgical planning with 3D printing While some people can (rightfully) snicker at VA, it is a undeniable a first mover in some of the biggest healthcare changes in the United States. That includes electronic healthcare system (EHRs). Here is an interesting article on the innovative history of VA.

Restor3d Secures $70M In New Financing To Advance 3D-Printed Implants The importance and practicality of “personalization device” are not straightforward because of current technological and resource constrains. This was addressed in our event recent.

Pre-Surgery 3D Printing Research Launched for Insurance Reimbursement Truth hurts. Sometimes, having the big picture does not make us feel better. Just when you are super excited about 3D printing for surgical planning, competing technologies with much less capEx are also showing up. AR/VR/MR, 3D scanning and intraoperative 3D cameras, intraoperative mobile MRIs are also very exciting and potentially endanger the promise 3D printing in this particular field. If this is a race, will 3D printing come out as a winner? Or should we put resources elsewhere, where 3D printing will likely win for the long run? This will be a hard question, and the concept of “sunk cost” immediately comes to mind.

A Band-Aid for the heart? New 3D printing method makes this, and much more, possible A new 3D printing technique,” CLEAR (for Continuous-curing after Light Exposure Aided by Redox initiation), follows a series of steps to entangle long molecules inside 3D-printed materials much like those intertwined worms.” Innovation = Observation of Nature ->Design ->Experiementation/Hypothesis ->Observation of Results -> Iterate

3D printing enabled ankle replacement solution receives FDA clearance Orthopedics is a great field to dig in for 3D printing OEMs. More similar partnerships are needed.

APL and CurifyLabs join forces to personalise medicinal administration with 3D printing Kids and pets, main customers of compound medicine, likely early customers of 3D printed pharmaceuticals.

Bioengineers and chemists design fluorescent 3D-printed structures with potential medical applications Serendipidous encounter ended in “sparkles”. Do you know that several common chemotherapy including doxorubicin has intrinsic fluorescent properties?

BellaSeno’s Pioneering 3D Printing Facility for Medical Implants to Open in 2025 Don’t miss our exclusive written and podcast interview with CEO and founder Mohit Chhaya

Brinter AM Technologies will provide a 3D BioPrinter for Advanced Tissue Manufacturing Capabilities at the International Space Station (ISS) for an ESA Project

NanoHive Raises $7m to Develop 3D-Printed Spinal Fusion Devices Check out Nanohive co-founder Ian Helmar’s  presentation at our latest 3D technology for Spine event that just happened.

3D-printed mini-tumours: a leap forward in improving cancer immunotherapy Sometimes, maybe “good enough” is good enough. Given more than 90% failure rate for cancer drugs at clinical trial stage, maybe a simplified bioprinted tumor model with smart design will do the job at an affordable price.

VCA Animal Hospitals Launches 3D Printing Lab for Pet Orthopedic Surgeries “VCA Animal Hospitals, incorporated as VCA, Inc., operates more than 1,000 animal hospitals in the US and Canada.The company is based in Los Angeles, and was founded in 1986. Until its acquisition by Mars Inc. in 2017, VCA traded on the NASDAQ under the ticker “WOOF”.”[Wikipedia”]

restor3d’s Kinos Range Ankle Implants with Additively Manufactured Cobalt Chrome Modular design allows surgeons to have intraoperative optionality to personalize final implantation outcome.

Building new bones with help from 3D printing One of a few (possibly only) mSLA-based 3D printable bone materials. “AESO is a novel and renewable liquid resin made by the epoxidation of fatty acid double bonds followed by epoxy ring acrylation and is an excellent option for 3D printing and photopolymerization to fabricate complex structure for biomedical applications, with multiple studies reporting no cytotoxicity.” Don’t miss our conversations on 3D printing bone and biomaterials this year.

Boston’s Additive Edge: Inside Boston Children’s Hospital 3D Printing Lab In addition to many fun memories as a fellow there more than a decade ago, every visit to CHB innovation lab is like traveling through a time and technology museum. Incredible group of clinicians and engineers working together. Sometimes the engineer is also the clinician (Kudos to my mentor Dr. Sanjay Prabhu).

Georgia Tech’s 3D Printed Splint Saves Another Child with Windpipe Defects Another life changing work out of the Hollister Lab. Check out a related event focusing on soft tissue engineering (breast implant) with a member out of Georgia Tech.

Self-improving AI increases 3D-printing efficiency Yes, one of the best ways AI/ML can help 3D printing is by optimizing machine settings for desired outcome. Bioprinting is even harder, and AI/ML could be even more helpful.

Enhancing neurosurgery with 3D printing You don’t need to be a neurosurgeon to realize how critical (and life saving) a good cranioplasty/cranial implant is to come patients. The number of people with a “hole” in their skull (literally) is not insignificant. Many have to live with this defect but they really should not have to. If you can stomach it, here is one article to see what they look like (and why some people would end up with it). Also, PEEK is not the only 3D-printable biomaterials that can do the job. Noval designs can enable a variety of biomaterials, including metallic implants to have the same mechanical properties similar to PEEK, as explained in our virtual event recently by Ruben Wauthle, CEO of Amnovis.

3D printing lung tissue from mucus-based bioink Despite more treatment for COPD, mortality for this increasingly more prevalent disease has not improved in past decades. In addition of vascularization, this is another approach towards our deeper understanding and therefore combating this silent pandemic. Here is the publication.

3D printing use in radiology saves an estimated 41 minutes, $2,500 per case Possibly one of the most important publications for healthcare 3D printing this year. “In terms of time spent, radiologists and other healthcare providers allocated about 34 minutes toward consultations, 32 minutes on segmentation, 21 minutes on computer-aided design, and 6 minutes on preparation/post-processing. The average total time expended per 3D printing case was 92.4 minutes for providers and 335 minutes for other nonproviders (e.g., technologists, engineers and scientists). These times correspond to an estimated provider effort cost of about $339 and $267 for other care team members, or a total of almost $606 per case on average.” Data is likely valuable and correct, but economic analysis may need a deeper dive.

Israeli Startup’s 3D Printer to Make Custom Lenses in Eye Clinics Another high value arena with many interesting new products leveraging 3D printing and bioprinting.

Researchers Develop 3D-Printed Medication To Treat Deadly Infection In Pediatric Patients Compound medicine is frequently much needed in the pedicatric population, as in veterinary medicine. Customization and small batch production are perfect problems to be solved by 3D printing.

Vital3D Talks Shaping the Future of Medicine With Organ Bioprinting Will photonics experts succeed in demoncratizing two-photon polymerization bioprinting?

3D printing goes “green” with microalgae ink Microalgae sounds almost magical. Instead of replacing all plastics (esp. PFAS), the economics (and performance) may be better to just replace all the PFAS in 3D printing, which claims to be environmentally friendly.

Metamaterial and 3D Printing Too many people are asking us what metamaterieals can do for healthcare 3D printing, and I did not even know what they are. Here is a short blog for some foundational information on this very relevant topic.

3D-printed PEEK-based Spine Implant Cleared by FDA PEEK has many advantages as a biomaterial for implants, but modified titanium and metamaterials could both disrupt its future markets.

BLI secures $1.8 million to advance 3D bioprinting Biological Lattice Industries (a Pitch3D startup) combines multiple biofabrication tools including MEW (Melt-electrowetting 3D printing) and AI/ML to create a powerful tissue engineering system. Check out the founder’s presentation in our past event here.

Subscribe here to receive the newsletter earlier than others.

The Illusion of Permanence, SHPWQ

May Newsletter: “Chip War”, True Frontier

April Newsletter: Are You A Neophiliac?

Year of Dragon 2024: Everyone Was Wrong in 2023

Lattice October 2023 Newsletter: “Elon Musk”

Lattice September 2023 Newsletter: The Status Game

Newsletter Archive

feature image

3DP for O&P: Are You Left Behind?

A week ago, we successfully concluded our event focusing on 3D printing (and 3D technologies in general) in the orthotics and prosthetics industry. This is one of the most critical topics that defines our vision and achievements in healthcare 3D printing, and therefore 3DHEALS events revisit this annually. For our 2024 version, our unique expert panel covered almost every body part in the O&P industry. The speakers included clinicians, industrialists, marketers, and startup founders. Each speaker brought their unique journeys (often measured in decades), perspectives, and wishlist to the conversation. What is also worth mentioning was our audience for the live event. Our analytics dashboard showed surprisingly strong results from India, Denmark, and Canada, in addition to our US audience, among 40+ countries. We also had one of the highest percentages of clinicians signed up for the event, 15%, as opposed to typically less than 10%. (Your prosthetists care! )The beauty of the 3DHEALS panel is that it is a mix of structured education in a relatively short period (15 minutes or so) and organic reactions and conversations among the audience. I want to thank all of the speakers, as well as a very engaging audience, for participating in this event. This blog contains my thoughts after the event. Frankly, I felt a bit out-of-date during the virtual event because there were so many advancements since I last reviewed the industry. Therefore, this blog contains my opinions, which are not necessarily the truth, and I am open to critiques.


Sustainability (Money) First.

Many don’t prioritize money in work, especially in the healthcare industry, where we prioritize patient benefits over pocketbooks. While that is the right attitude, a realistic understanding of the economics of 3D printing adaptation is critical to building a sustainable clinical practice and business that will benefit more people for longer. Digital transformation takes a lot of analysis, planning, and forecasting. Different geographies, patient demographics, payor mix, reimbursement pathways, and other economic environments determine how a clinic or business adapts to the technology. Fortunately, many 3D printing vendors (such as HP, Inc.) have done much of the homework and approached their potential customers with data and charts to make such analysis easier. Nowadays, I doubt a conversation about 3D printing capex expenditures can start without a spreadsheet. The goal is clear: a sustainable pathway for long-term digital adoption for the masses and, ultimately, a complete replacement of traditional O&P practices. It is less about selling a printer and more about promoting a concept, a vision, and a smooth digital workflow that will increase our productivity by 10x.

Cooperation Is the Key.

Once upon a time, I fondly witnessed heated debates on EBM (Electron Beam Melting) versus SLM (Selective Laser Melting), which I suspect is still ongoing. While some of our speakers are obvious experts in specific 3D printing technologies (MJF, SLS, FDM, to name a few), there was a strong sense of cooperation. The mutual understanding is that this is not a zero-sum game, and everyone could create an excellent business case for the right patient and clinic. This is an early-stage industry, and 99% of the market is still up for grabs. Therefore, the more immediate threat to survival is not a particular technique or machine manufacturer but common enemies like a lack of next-generation education, more accessible or updated reimbursement pathways, and sustainable business practices. This sense of cooperation will serve the industry well for the immediate future.

Digital Transformation On Demand


Software is essential (for 3D printing). Some obvious benefits include increasing productivity (especially in terms of personalization of devices), increasing access to better practices, and quicker product differentiation by embedding unique design advantages (mechanical properties, lightweight, manufacturing scalability, etc.). When we just founded 3DHEALS, I frequently heard complaints that clinical people had to adapt to industrial solutions for healthcare use because there was a lack of healthcare-specific 3D printing software solutions. That landscape is rapidly changing in the O&P industry and the medical and dental sectors. More and more larger companies are doubling down on focusing on healthcare-industry-specific software. Proteor, a 100+-year-old Frech O&P company (a company I did not know before our last event), is now a leading 3D printing software provider with a decent US market share in 3D printed devices. This ambition was there 20 years ago. This tells me the probability of O&P moving away from digital transformation is nearly zero, and those not using this should catch up. Something parallel to the dental and hearing aids industry and the orthopedic implant space.

The other digital transformation is happening in the startup landscape. Icarus Medical Innovation focuses on improving knee osteoarthritis care. While it uses 3D printing as core manufacturing technology, the company invested early and heavily in software, including a patient-facing iPhone-based 3D scanning app, and automated the device’s design process. This shift of emphasis on optimizing the software to improve the workflow and bottom line is becoming increasingly popular. Buy a half million machine first, or a 50K software tool to increase half a million dollar efficiency? You do the math. This makes sense the many OEMs are also increasingly acquiring software startups and then re-offer these as a bundle to their customers.

2025 Forecasts:

Based on the final remarks of our speakers, here are some 2025 predictions for 3D printed O&P, and it would be fun to revisit these predictions by the end of next year:

  • More clarified CTP code, reimbursement pathway for 3D printed O&P products
  • New in-office, smaller footprint industry-quality 3D printers using a variety of techniques such as SLS
  • New material selections (including metamaterials) for 3D-printed O&P devices

What do you predict?

Email me here: jennychen@3dheals.com

You can now watch this recording on-demand for a few weeks until December 12th (when we host our next event).  Please take a look at the instructions below. After Dec 12th, you can find this recording for a fee on 3dheals.com. For those with short attention spans, we regularly publish highlights of the events on our YouTube channel.  The audio recording will also be available on our “The Lattice” podcast in a few days for more auditory-oriented people.  

Interview with Evan Eckersley: Icarus Medical Innovations

Interview with Drew Meyer: 3D Printing Orthotics and Prosthesis

Interview with Melanie Shelton: 3D printing adoption in O&P

Interview with Brent Wright: 3D Printed Orthotics and Prosthetics
Interview with Chris Baschuk: Partial Hand Prosthetics

3D Printed Orthotics and Prosthetics (On Demand, 2024)

3D Printing for O&P (On Demand 2023)

Biomaterials for 3D Printing Bioprinting (On Demand, 2024)

Past event recordings



 

metafold 3D

Interview with Elissa Ross: Mathematics Behind Metafold 3D

blank

Elissa Ross is a mathematician and the CEO of Toronto-based startup Metafold 3D. Metafold makes an engineering design platform for additive manufacturing, with an emphasis on supporting engineers using metamaterials, lattices, and microstructures at industrial scales. Elissa holds a PhD in discrete geometry (2011) and worked as an industrial geometry consultant for eight years before cofounding Metafold. Metafold is the result of observations made in the consulting context about the challenges and opportunities of 3D printing. Elissa spoke at our recent virtual event focusing on Design for Medical 3D Printing.

When was the first encounter you had with 3D printing?

Elissa: My first encounter with 3D printing was printing some shapes that resulted from some mathematical research. It was interesting because they were shapes I had described in algorithms and equations but never visualized physically. I sent the files to a nearby 3D printing shop, and they printed them using FDM. The results were relatively poor, and I mostly dismissed them. 

I first engaged with 3D printing in 2014 during a mathematics research project related to architecture. Working on a problem defining three-dimensional solids algorithmically, I realized creating a physical model would be impossible with traditional media, so I turned to 3D printing. Even though the results weren’t astounding, the potential of materializing abstract mathematical concepts was compelling. This appreciation for digital manufacturing continues to inspire my work in metamaterials and additive manufacturing today.

blank
Filter Cartridges (Copyright: Metafold 3D)

What inspired you to start your journey?

Elissa: After my PhD in mathematics, I worked as a geometry consultant, solving complex geometry issues for engineering, architecture, and manufacturing. My co-founder Daniel and I were hired by a sportswear manufacturer aiming to employ 3D printing and lattice geometry to achieve high-performance materials for athletes. However, there was no effective software for their needs. This led us to two core concepts that inspired us to start Metafold 3D:

1. Current CAD software doesn’t work for additive manufacturing.

2. Specialized companies often need custom digital tooling for manufacturing, which usually involves a lot of geometry.

We recognized these as broader challenges in additive manufacturing, where software lags behind hardware development. We believed we had the resources to create software to address this gap. This was substantiated through numerous discussions, with a standout quote from a 3D printer manufacturer, “We can print things we can’t design.” At Metafold, we’re aiming to change that. 

Who inspired you the most along this journey in 3D printing?

Elissa: I’m motivated by our customers, who do remarkable things using 3D printing. Whether bioreactors, chromatography devices, filters, carbon capture devices, orthotics, or heat exchangers, I’ve encountered many people pushing the boundaries of manufacturing innovation using 3D printing. They are persistent because they are driven by the benefits they see in the outcome — more efficient, optimized application parts. Additionally, my co-founder Tom’s ability to effortlessly design, print, and manage the complete manufacturing process, despite its complexities, is deeply inspiring.

blank
Bioreactors (Copyright: Metafold 3D)

What motivates you the most for your work? 

Elissa: Conversations with people realizing the transformative potential of 3D printing to unlock new, better, more efficient, and more sustainable ways to manufacture things motivate me immensely. One of the critical capabilities of 3D printing is the ability to pack surface area into small volumes, usually through a triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS). These are great because they provide increased surface area, especially for biotech applications—for example, cell growth, filtration, or tissue adhesion. And I think we are only scratching the surface (pun intended!) of the possibilities of the methodology.

What is/are the biggest obstacle(s) in your line of work? If you have conquered them, what were your solutions? 

Elissa: Well, I’m four years into cofounding and being the CEO of a startup, which is all kinds of challenging! It truly makes the math PhD look like a piece of cake! Operating under an incredible amount of uncertainty is the defining feature. 

At the same time, it is fascinating. I don’t have any ‘solutions,’ but I can say that working with incredible people keeps me going every day. Building a team to work on complex problems has been amazing; it is all about those relationships.

blank
Simulation (Copyright: Metafold 3D)

What do you think is (are) the biggest challenge(s) in 3D Printing/bio-printing? What do you think the potential solution(s) is (are)?

Elissa:

As everyone knows, there are plenty of challenges in 3D printing and bio-printing. A focus for me, of course, is on the mathematical and geometric challenges. At Metafold we’ve seen this come in two flavours:

  1. You have data, and you need shapes.
    Usually, this starts with a performance target—for example, optimized structures for the osseointegration of an orthopedic implant. Your chosen printing method imposes certain design constraints (overhangs, supports, etc.). Finally, there is some physics that you care about—mechanical loading and fluid flow for our example. The question is: What SHAPE will satisfy all these requirements (targets, constraints, physics)?
    This is not an easy problem, and the answer is geometry.
  2. You have shapes, and you want data.
    The other flavour begins with geometry, and asks for insight about the shape. For example, if you hand me a CAD file, what can I tell you about it? What manufacturing process should we use to make it (this goes beyond additive)? Where are the holes? What are the notable or defining geometric features? This kind of analysis is surprisingly hard to do with classical CAD which is why we have a different approach.

​Metafold‘s delivers geometric capabilities via API to solve tough design, simulation, automation and commercialization challenges with our customers. We really focus on the ways that geometry gets in the way of engineers being innovative, and use our technology to clear the path.

If a higher being granted you three wishes, what would they be? 

Elissa: Right now, I feel like there aren’t enough hours in the day. It’s not really that I want more hours, though, just that I’d somehow like the ability to slow down or stretch out time. I wish I could do that pinching motion you do on a tablet to zoom in and out, but on all of life.

I know the clever thing to do here is to ask for infinite wishes, but I’m just going to call it that one wish about time.

blank
Metamaterials (Copyright: Metafold 3D)

What advice would you give to an intelligent, driven college student in the “real world”? What bad advice have you heard that they should ignore? 

Elissa: A piece of obvious but essential advice I got when I struggled in graduate school was just: get the degree, because then you have it, and it becomes a rubber stamp for you going forward. This is especially important if you have unusual interests (I studied math and visual art). 

Beyond that, you can’t go wrong with math. It’s an incredible thing to study, and math professors are comically hopeless at knowing what you can do with a math degree. The world needs problem solvers; nothing trains you for this better than math. 

Finally, there is one piece of advice that doesn’t get talked about enough: No one in the world will have as significant an impact on your professional career as your choice of life partner (the impact on your personal life is evident). But I think this is probably impossible advice to hear when you are in your twenties. 

What to ignore? Any recommendations to FOCUS should probably be discarded. A breadth of experience leads to richer insights and the ability to make connections. I have passionately pursued interdisciplinarity and collaboration throughout my career, and it’s never steered me wrong!

What’s your favorite book you read this year and why? Alternatively, what’s your favorite book of all times you read and why?

Elissa:

This one is easy and I also love this question! I read “Endurance: Shackleton’s Incredible Voyage” last March, which is when winter begins to feel truly endless in Toronto. It was written by Alfred Lansing, published in 1959, and details the 1914 journey led by Sir Ernest Shackleton in an attempt to cross Antarctica. This story is absolutely wild, and beautifully written. I cannot recommend it highly enough for a few reasons:

First the project itself is so unbelievable: the spirit of exploration and inquiry that drove this voyage into the unknown and the terrible, it boggles my mind. Especially when compared with the known-ness, the stability and the comforts of my world in 2024. I recognize this is not evenly distributed, but seriously: no one lives in Antarctica. And then the details of the experience itself — what these men endured both physically and mentally is hard to fathom. Just when you think it can’t possibly get worse, it does. I mean, startups are hard, but we’ve got nothing on Shackleton.

We can be inspired though! A startup-relevant passage highlighted by Davide Marini (CEO of InkBit) was this: “From studying the outcome of past expeditions, he believed that those that burdened themselves with equipment to meet every contingency had fared much worse than those that had sacrificed total preparedness for speed.”

Related Links:

Metamaterial and 3D Printing

Interview with Jade Myers: Designing 3D Printed Prosthetic

Design for 3D Printed Medical Devices (On Demand Video)

Designing and Equipping 3D Bioprinting Facilities

Robert Pugliese: Design for Healthcare with 3DPrinting (Podcast)

Virtual Reality Software For Molecular Modeling and Structure-Based Drug Design

blank

Interview with Evan Eckersley: Icarus Medical Innovations

blank

Evan Eckersley holds degrees in Bioengineering and Finance from Lehigh University’s IBE program with a strong focus on customer-centric design and innovation. Previously, he applied his experience in protein engineering and synthetic biology as founder and COO of Lytos Technologies. At Lytos, he led R&D and commercialization efforts of an engineered enzymatic fungicide for crop protection, biomanufacturing scale-up, fundraising, and regulation. At Icarus, he has applied his operational and biomanufacturing experience to scale Icarus’ digital and additive fabrication system to rapidly deliver highly customized devices on a mass scale while ensuring a high-quality customer experience from sales through manufacturing. He oversees company finance, marketing, regulatory, and clinical research efforts. Evan is passionate about Icarus’ mission to deliver better outcomes with functional, highly personalized devices through the combination of advanced digital and additive technologies while maximizing access to patients in need with innovative go-to-market strategies. Evan spoke at our recent event focusing on 3D printed orthotics and prosthetics.

When was the first encounter you had with 3D printing?

Evan: I first encountered 3D printing technology in a maker lab in high-school. The course was focused on innovations in biotechnology and may have set me on the course to study and pursue a career in bioengineering. I clearly didn’t understand the full implications of the technology at the time (and am still learning now). However, I understood that the technology would empower entrepreneurs and makers, providing a catalyst for innovation and invention in a broader sense. I remember envisioning a day when a 3D printer would be a common household appliance – maybe that day will come!

What inspired you to start your journey?

Evan: As an engineer, I always saw entrepreneurship as the most direct path to creating major impact. In college, I noticed that the field of bioengineering was, and still is, at the threshold of major innovations that will change the landscape in health, energy, and society as a whole. I went overboard on a capstone project to explore the current state and future of 3D bioprinting where possibilities like synthetic organs, lab-on-a-chip applications, and the ability of producing bespoke devices instantly at scale were coming into view. Less than 10 years later, these innovations have come to life ( e.g. the recent successful transplant of a 3D printed trachea). I am excited and honored to be pushing the boundaries of industrial printing in the orthopedics space with our technology at Icarus. 

blank

Who inspired you the most along this journey in 3D printing ?

Evan: Professor Pat Costa was an unconventional and inspiring mentor of mine from my entrepreneurship program in College. He wasn’t an academic but rather a self-made business owner that carved his own path. We spent many late nights in the printing lab developing prototypes for a local medical device company – and he ultimately inspired me to start my first business out of college instead of pursuing a graduate degree. I also have to give a shoutout to Dave, our CEO and founder at Icarus, who convinced me to make the jump from the world of synthetic biology to the world of medical devices. We have already pushed the boundaries of digital automation and 3D printing of custom devices at scale – and it feels like we’re just getting started. 

What motivates you the most for your work? 

Evan: Impact. 

What is/are the biggest obstacle(s) in your line of work? If you have conquered them, what were your solutions? 

Evan: In addition to the challenges facing any startup, Icarus has challenges that may be unique to our business model. We are vertically integrated, having a direct sales force, engineering team, and managing 100% of our manufacturing locally in Charlottesville. With the uncertainty and lean conditions of a startup bringing a new technology to market, it is a constant challenge to balance the workings of every department to scale together and at a fast-pace (nearly doubling annually). Throw in the challenges of delivering custom devices with leading patient outcomes within one week to anywhere in the country while meeting the high standards of orthopedic practices. On top of that, we are fundamentally changing the habits in an industry that has not changed in decades. 

One solution to many of these challenges is in the digital approach. We have developed automation software that reduces custom design time from 8 hours to 5 minutes. We have created systems, including a custom ERP, to automate workflows, streamline communications, and provide data to make better business decisions quickly. We also constantly collect data from our customers and our team to operate a continuous feedback loop that improves our performance across the board. This has been the key to our ability to scale a relatively complex business process.  

blank

What do you think is (are) the biggest challenge(s) in 3D Printing? What do you think the potential solution(s) is (are)?

Evan: Challenges specific to our industry are the cost and strength of the materials. In dealing with orthotic devices, you are competing against traditionally manufactured devices that are assembled at massive scales overseas and from durable materials, such as metal or carbon fiber. We have been able to compete in certain niches by differentiating our product, offering substantially improved outcomes through the unique functionality of our device, and leveraging software to automate the design and manufacturing process. As technology advances and as competitors enter the industrial 3D printing space, the hope is that the baseline costs of industrial printing will come down in the future. Until then, it is important to position our products based on value and service rather than price. 

If you are granted three wishes by a higher being, what would they be? 

Evan: One could wish that our company was instantly successful or that all of society’s problems could be solved. However, the real value is in the climb to achieve that success and the lessons gained along the way. 

blank

What advice would you give to a smart driven college student in the “real world”? What bad advices you heard should they ignore? 

Evan: This world has no shortage of problems to be solved. If you truly want to have an impact, invest in yourself early and often. It is easier to take a risk earlier in life, learn and keep moving forward. You will inevitably encounter real failure if you seek to find and break your own limits, and that failure can sting a lot more than those you may experience in college. However, the battle scars you gain along the way by challenging yourself to “do the impossible” might give you the opportunity do something truly important in the lives of others – to have a real impact. There, you can find real fulfillment. 

What’s your favorite book you read this year and why? Alternatively, what’s your favorite book of all times you read and why?

Evan: The Hard thing about Hard things by Ben Horowitz was a good recent read. It provides a real glimpse into the highs and lows of growing a business: and the moments that decide whether a business will succeed in the face of great adversity. 

Interview with Melanie Shelton: 3D printing adoption in O&P
Biomaterials for 3D Printing Bioprinting (On Demand, 2024)

3D Printing for O&P (On Demand 2023)

Interview with Brent Wright: 3D Printed Orthotics and Prosthetics
Interview with Chris Baschuk: Partial Hand Prosthetics

blank

Interview with Melanie Shelton: 3D printing adoption in O&P

blank

Melanie Shelton has nearly two decades of experience in the O&P industry. Her expertise spans from establishing and overseeing distributorships for orthotic fabrication equipment across Europe, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia, to account management, Crisis Communications, Marketing and clinical support. In her previous role at HP, she spearheaded the development and adoption of the Arize Orthotic Solution for four years, demonstrating her commitment to innovation and digital workflow automation. She is currently leading HP’s efforts to advance 3D printing adoption and manufacturing efficiency in the O&P Industry. Her depth of experience and record of success in technological advancement in the O&P arena point to her commitment to help drive the industry forward. Melanie will be a speaker at our upcoming virtual event focusing on 3D printing in o&P.

When was the first encounter you had with 3D printing?

Melanie: About 8 years ago I left the O&P industry. At the time I felt that innovation in the industry was stalling – at this time 3D printing wasn’t even a consideration – and I was concerned that my career would stall out a bit too. I consulted for a good friend who was building her communication firm and did some other marketing projects.  A few years later a doctor friend called me and let me know he was working on a project with HP in their 3D printing organization and he thought I would be a good fit for the job. I met with the lead product manager who talked about all of the ways that HP was being used in the O&P market and the project they were currently working on. I found it so exciting! I felt that it was finally the innovation needed to move O&P forward to the digital era. 

What inspired you to start your journey?

 Melanie: As I stated above, I was lucky that it fell into my lap, but I was familiar with 3D printing in general. What I find fascinating in retrospective is how little I understood about the various methods of 3D printing. Like many people not familiar with the industry, we tend to believe that 3D printing is one defined way of printing, when there is a vast array of products, all with different strengths in varying applications. 

Who inspired you the most along this journey?

Melanie: I have a wonderful friend and mentor, Jason Kraus, who has been in the foot orthotic business for practically all of his career – well over 40 years. I asked him to consult for our orthotic project because I needed someone with a deep understanding off all the various facets of traditional manufacturing that we needed to consider and build into our digital workflow.  What I greatly appreciated about that experience was his dedicated focus on the customer’s needs. He didn’t get too swayed by the shiny bauble of 3D printing, but kept our team very grounded in understanding the customer at that moment, their need at that moment, and staunchly defending that from our “big ideas”. Not that he was against innovation, but we had to have a strong understanding of every single stakeholder and every single step to understand where and how we could change processes to a digital workflow that would make the customer’s and patients experience better, not just different. 

What motivates you the most for your work? 

Melanie: There is nothing more exciting than talking to practitioners and designers in this industry that are passionate about what they do! At the end of the day, we all want to make patient’s lives better and you can feel that energy when talking with them. I get opportunities to help them with a process, an idea, or just sit there and learn about what they are doing. The fact that I get to do this every day, and there are still so many more people to meet and be inspired by, that’s what gets me motivated.  

What is/are the biggest obstacle(s) in your line of work? If you have conquered them, what were your solutions? 

Melanie: At HP with my role specifically, it’s about adoption. An HP MJF printer is really just one part of many decisions that a company needs to make as they are transitioning or adopting 3D printing. To help costumers understand what their journey is, how to navigate it, and to understand when and how they can leverage HP’s MJF printers is a huge challenge. We are trying to better understand the customer journey to help guide them, but at the end of the day the decisions about how they want to incorporate software and digital workflows is completely out of our hands but can have a big impact on if/when and how they use HP MJF printers. 

What do you think is (are) the biggest challenge(s) in 3D Printing? What do you think the potential solution(s) is (are)?

Melanie: I think it goes back to users understanding the different capabilities of various 3D printing technologies so they can make informed decisions about what best to adopt for their needs. I would love to say it should always be HP’s MJF, but of course that is not true. 

If you are granted three wishes by a higher being, what would they be? 

Melanie: I would revamp the entire CMS HCPC coding system. It would probably take all three wishes to make it happen. It’s such a mess!

What advice would you give to a smart driven college student in the “real world”? What bad advices you heard should they ignore?

 

Melanie: A very easy, practical tip is that if you are ever in a discussion where you don’t agree with someone’s assessment/plan/idea, the first thing you do is ask the question “Why?”. Don’t say or imply you disagree immediately, but just try to understand what informed their decision or opinion. You will sound so much more informed, thoughtful, and you will have a better time getting them to hear your disagreement because you gave them the opportunity to be heard first. It took me way too long in my career to learn this!

This is so old school, but I remember a former sales manager telling me to never apologize because it makes you look weak. That’s the worst advice! 

What’s your favorite book you read this year and why? Alternatively, what’s your favorite book of all times you read and why?

Melanie: One of my favorite professional development books I read this year is Crucial Conversations. It does a great job framing the ingredients for very combative, high-stakes situations, the science behind what happens when we “lose it,” and how to stay focused and deliberate to reach a resolution. I took away a few good tips from this book. 

My all-time favorite is Lonesome Dove by Larry McMurtry. It’s an absolutely beautifully written book. It subverts the idea of the traditional cowboy with swagger and confidence. They do have that, but they also struggle with themes of morality, purpose and the necessity of violence. The women are fascinating and well-developed, not just love interests but there to hold their place firmly alongside the men’s stories. It’s well-paced, and easy to get lost in. I recommend it to everyone, and no one has been disappointed about it yet. 

How AI and 3D Printing Enhance Crafting Custom Orthotics and Prosthetics

3D Printed Orthotics and Prosthetics (On Demand, 2021)

Biomaterials for 3D Printing Bioprinting (On Demand, 2024)

3D Printing for O&P (On Demand 2023)

Interview with Brent Wright: 3D Printed Orthotics and Prosthetics
Interview with Chris Baschuk: Partial Hand Prosthetics

victoria hand project

Michael Peirone: Victoria Hand Project

blank

Michael Peirone started volunteering with Victoria Hand Project when it was still a university research project, and has seen it grow across the world. Through his years with VHP, Michael has gotten a broad view of the organization as a volunteer, student intern, Biomedical Designer, the COO, and most recently taking on the role of CEO. Michael Peirone will be sharing his experiences at our virtual event 3D Printed Prosthetics.

Jenny: When was the first encounter you had with 3D printing?

Michael: I first encountered 3D printing when visiting Dr. Nick Dechev’s lab at the University of Victoria. There was an FDM printer and an SLA printer being tested to compare the printing process and to determine which style was best for 3D printing prosthetic arms in developing countries. These were some of the first 3D printers on campus, except for an old, large-format printer that quickly became outdated compared to these desktop 3D printers. I was so amazed by the technology and couldn’t stop starring as each layer of material was laid down. After years of working in the space, my amazement in the printers has decreased, so it is always nice to be reminded of it when people visit the lab and see the 3D printers for the first time.

Jenny: What inspired you to start your journey?

Michael: I chose to study Biomedical Engineering at the University of Victoria to study in a field bridging the gap between engineering and medicine. I did not know exactly what I wanted to do after graduating but I knew that I wanted to do something in Biomedical Engineering. After I started volunteering with Dr. Nick Dechev’s lab I saw the positive impacts that 3D printed prosthetic arms could have in developing countries and knew that I wanted to dedicate my life to this cause.

blank

Jenny: Who inspired you the most along this journey in 3D printing?

Michael: I was very fortunate to travel to Nepal to help expand Victoria Hand Project as a student intern in Summer 2016. During my time there, I trained our partners on how to use 3D printing and 3D scanning to make custom prosthetic arms and helped establish operations in Kathmandu. I had the opportunity to sit in on a fitting with a man who traveled for more than a day on a bus to receive a prosthetic arm. He lost his arm 20 years before and never had a prosthetic device. When he arrived, he was very shy and didn’t want anyone to see his missing limb. By the end of the fitting, he became more confident and was even posing for photos. This was one of the first fitting sessions I witnessed and has been one of the most memorable. 

Jenny: What motivates you the most for your work? 

Michael: Some of the recipients of the Victoria Hand will direct message us over Facebook or Instagram expressing how happy they are after receiving their hand.  Many of them say they now feel more confident in public and don’t need to ask others for help. There are times when the work can become difficult, but these messages help us remember how life-changing this care can be to someone in a developing country.

blank

Jenny: What is/are the biggest obstacle(s) in your line of work? If you have conquered them, what were your solutions? 

Michael: There is such a vast need for prosthetic care, and we want to help but do not have the reach or the resources. We receive many messages from prosthetists and patients in developing countries who want us to expand operations to their area or need a  Victoria Hand. Unfortunately, if they are not close to one of our partner clinics they will need to travel far distances to receive care. Since we are only working in 8 developing countries there are still many people who cannot access care. We are fundraising to expand to new areas of the world where there is a great need for prosthetic care. This will allow more people in the world’s poorest areas to access prosthetic care more easily. 

Jenny: What do you think is (are) the biggest challenge(s) in 3D Printing/bio-printing? What do you think the potential solution(s) is (are)?

Michael: While many prosthetists and orthotists have told us 3D printing has allowed them to reduce waste, the amount of plastic waste is still something we want to decrease. We feel that there can still be many improvements to reduce the environmental impact of 3D printing. Fortunately, we have found groups to collaborate with who will take the 3D printed waste off our hands to recycle it, or to use it in their research. We have also heard of companies accepting back material waste to turn into recycled filament, and customers can receive a discount on future orders if they send material back. We believe that there will be many groups finding unique solutions to reducing waste or upcycling the waste into useful products. 

blank

Jenny: If you are granted three wishes by a higher being, what would they be? 

Michael:

  1. Funding and resources to expand to more regions in need around the world, including Syria.
  2. Funding and resources to continue our work with existing partners. 
  3. Unlimited R&D budget.

Jenny: What advice would you give to a smart driven college student in the “real world”?

Michael: Make time for your hobby (rock climbing for me). You can’t improve the world if you don’t make time for rest and recovery.

Interview with Brent Wright: 3D Printed Orthotics and Prosthetics

How AI and 3D Printing Enhance Crafting Custom Orthotics and Prosthetics

3D Printed Orthotics and Prosthetics (2021, on demand)

Interview: Dr. Nick Dechev, Associate Professor in the Faculty of Engineering, and is presently Director of the Biomedical Engineering Program