The Australian Bioprinting Workshop for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine was founded to create a community of scientists, clinicians, and engineers to work in synergy with industry, government, and regulatory agencies to tackle key challenges in the bioprinting field and facilitate the clinical translation of this promising technology1. Annual workshops are hosted by the University of Technology Sydney (UTS) alongside company sponsorship, with support from professional 3D printing networks such as 3DHeals.
Why the Workshop?
In recent years, Australia has seen considerable growth and investment dedicated to establishing collaborative research centers to maximize research impact through industry orientated projects and clinical translation. This is supported by the several bioprinting laboratories located within a hospital, such as the Herston Biofabrication Institute at Metro North Hospital, Brisbane, and BioFab3D located within St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne.
These workshops seek to build upon existing collaborative partnerships to assist in publications of international scientific consensus on key developmental areas including biomaterials for bioprinting, organ-on-a-chip studies, and the bioprinting of tissue-specific models for drug development and oncology applications2. Key elements in developing these events have been the principle that all member publications should reflect a consensus of those engaged in its continued discussions.
The meeting was opened by the Head of the School of Biomedical Engineering at UTS, Prof. Joanne Tipper, and Dr. Carmine Gentile, the workshop organizer, and leader of the Cardiovascular Regeneration Group both at UTS and at the Kolling Institute/the University of Sydney, followed by introducing the program for the day and chairing the opening session focusing on industry innovation, as detailed below.
The purpose of this session was to provide the opportunity to hear directly from world leaders in the field of bioprinting how commercially available bioprinting platforms are helping researchers in tackling several of the problems characteristic of bioprinted tissues. This session was opened by Dr. Manuel Figueruela García (Regemat3D) with a focus on the customization of bioprinting and bioreactor platforms that can be applied through tissue specificity for regenerative medicine applications.
Derek Mathers (Advanced Solutions Life Sciences) and Dr. Martin Engel alongside Dr. Jeremy Dobrowolski (Inventia Life Science) discussed the benefits of establishing automated workcell operations for biofabrication processes and recent advances in 3D cell culture using digital bioprinting platforms, respectively.
Dr. Haruka Yoshie (CELLINK) closed the session by detailing a range of tissue-specific applications, spanning from extrusion-based and light-activated polymers, with a focus on their limitations and possibilities associated with each fabrication modality.
Biomaterials for Bioprinting
Identifying the optimal biomaterial for bioprinting tissues and organs is one of the greatest challenges in defining the microenvironment in which cells to grow 3. Prof. Gordon Wallace and Dr. Zhilian Yue of the University of Wollongong (UOW) introduced their recent progression on biopolymers for bioinks for bioprinting, raising issues associated with the sourcing of biomaterials, processing requirements, and logistical considerations required when planning for the future clinical translation of bioprinted tissues and organs4, 5.
Dr. Khoon Lim of the University of Otago opened his presentation on the use of light-activated polymers for bioprinting applications by covering aspects of photo-crosslinking approaches6.
Bioprinting of Organoids and Tissues
Next generation organogenesis has the potential to revolutionize many biofabrication processes. These include cosmetics testing and drug development by improving clinical trial speeds and model efficacy whilst reducing associated costs and the dependence for early-stage animal studies7, 8.
Prof. Anthony Weiss of the University of Sydney summarized his group’s recent efforts in the generation and use of human recombinant elastin-based bioinks for bioprinting vascularized soft tissues9. Central to developing the next generation of human tissues and organs is the need to address the field’s most prominent hurdle of achieving perfusable vascularization within bioprinted constructs and in-vitro systems 10, 11.
A/Prof. Jeremy Crook (UOW), Dr. Carmine Gentile (UTS), and Dr. Anita Quigley (RMIT) reported their recent progression in reproducing neuronal models12, cardiac12, and skeletal muscle models13, respectively.
Crosstalk with clinical partners is fundamental for speedy translation of findings from the bench to the bedside. Prof. Peter Choong of the University of Melbourne described his clinical perspectives for bone tissue bioprinting to open the session and how surgeons can work together with engineers and biologists to look for practical solutions to key clinical problems that typically arise from trauma and osteoarthritis. Prof. Choong outlined the regenerative potential of combing stem cells with bioprinting techniques in order to fill bone defects and by developing a handheld device for surgical applications14, 15.
Dr. Liudmila Polonchuk (Hoffman La-Roche) discussed the potential use of bioprinted tissues for drug development, with an application in cardiac safety.
The four major driving factors of bioprinting development can be attributed from increasing public and private investments in drug discovery, cosmetics testing, tissue regeneration, and medical device development16. In order to safeguard patient safety whilst aiding the successful translation of bioprinting technologies, Michelle Knight (Hydrix) discussed the regulatory requirements to ensure maximum benefit and minimum risk to the patient.
Prof. Dianne Nicol of the University of Tasmania followed by detailing the patentability of bioprinting technologies, highlighting that there are currently approximately more than 700 patents and applications worldwide with only a small percentage abandoned, suggesting an active growth phase17.
Stepping into the future
A better understanding of where the field is potentially going and where new technologies may benefit from the crosstalk between experts in different fields were the focus of this session.
Dr. Alfredo Martinez-Coll (UTS) opened the session with a presentation on market trends in bioprinting technologies, in which organ-on-a-chip models were described as playing a key role in the development of the field.
Dr. Mark Allenby of the Queensland University of Technology describing the potential of harnessing computational modeling to enhance biofabrication processes18.
Next Dr. Irina Kabakova (UTS) outlined the capabilities of 3D non-contact micromechanical characterization for bioprinted structures and materials19, followed by the final keynote presentation for the day on the magnetic levitational bioassembly of 3D tissue constructs in space by Dr. Vladimir Mironov (3D Bioprinting Solutions)20. The decision to conduct bioassembly experiments of cartilage generation in space further warrants a growing vested interest in biofabrication technologies and in the evaluation of the effects of microgravity on human intervertebral discs and articular cartilages during long-term spaceflights.
The event was supported by the School of Biomedical Engineering (FEIT) at the University of Technology Sydney (UTS, Australia), and the several sponsors that supported the meeting: CELLINK, REGEMAT3D, Inventia Life Science, Cytiva, Advanced Solutions, RegenHU, Poietis, Fluicell, Lastek. A particular thanks to 3D Heals for their kind support as well.
2. Shrestha, J.; Razavi Bazaz, S.; Aboulkheyr Es, H., et al.: Lung-on-a-chip: the future of respiratory disease models and pharmacological studies.Critical Reviews in Biotechnology: 40 (2), 213-230, 2020.
3. Groll, J.; Burdick, J.; Cho, D., et al.: A definition of bioinks and their distinction from biomaterial inks. 2018.
4. Javadi, M.; Gu, Q.; Naficy, S., et al.: Conductive Tough Hydrogel for Bioapplications.Macromolecular Bioscience: 18 (2), 1700270, 2018.
5. Chen, Z.; You, J.; Liu, X., et al.: Biomaterials for corneal bioengineering.Biomedical Materials: 13 (3), 032002, 2018.
6. Lim, K. S.; Galarraga, J. H.; Cui, X., et al.: Fundamentals and Applications of Photo-Cross-Linking in Bioprinting.Chemical Reviews: 120 (19), 10662-10694, 2020.
7. Giwa, S.; Lewis, J. K.; Alvarez, L., et al.: The promise of organ and tissue preservation to transform medicine.Nature Biotechnology: 35 (6), 530-542, 2017.
8. Sreekala, P.; Suresh, M.; Lakshmi Priyadarsini, S.: 3D organ printing: Review on operational challenges and constraints.Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020.
9. Lee, S.; Sani, E. S.; Spencer, A. R., et al.: Human‐Recombinant‐Elastin‐Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting of Vascularized Soft Tissues.Advanced Materials, 2003915, 2020.
10. Grover, H.; Spatarelu, C.-P.; De’De, K., et al.: Vascularization in 3D printed tissues: emerging technologies to overcome longstanding obstacles.AIMS Cell and Tissue Engineering: 2 (3), 163-184, 2018.
11. Kim, J. J.; Hou, L.; Huang, N. F.: Vascularization of three-dimensional engineered tissues for regenerative medicine applications.Acta Biomater: 41, 17-26, 2016.
12. Tomaskovic‐Crook, E.; Zhang, P.; Ahtiainen, A., et al.: Human Neural Tissues from Neural Stem Cells Using Conductive Biogel and Printed Polymer Microelectrode Arrays for 3D Electrical Stimulation.Advanced Healthcare Materials: 8 (15), 1900425, 2019.
13. Quigley, A. F.; Cornock, R.; Mysore, T., et al.: Wet-Spun Trojan Horse Cell Constructs for Engineering Muscle.Frontiers in Chemistry: 8, 2020.
14. Duchi, S.; Onofrillo, C.; O’Connell, C., et al., Bioprinting Stem Cells in Hydrogel for In Situ Surgical Application: A Case for Articular Cartilage. Springer US: 2020; pp 145-157.
15. Duchi, S.; Onofrillo, C.; O’Connell, C. D., et al.: Handheld co-axial bioprinting: application to in situ surgical cartilage repair.Scientific reports: 7 (1), 5837, 2017.
16. Bicudo, E.; Faulkner, A.; Li, P.: Patents and the experimental space: social, legal and geographical dimensions of 3D bioprinting.International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 1-22, 2020.
17. Mendis, D. K.; Lemley, M. A.; Rimmer, M., 3D printing and beyond : intellectual property and regulation. Edward Elgar Publishing: 2019.
18. Buenzli, P. R.; Lanaro, M.; Wong, C. S., et al., Cell proliferation and migration explain pore bridging dynamics in 3D printed scaffolds of different pore size. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: 2020.
19. Wu, P.-J.; Masouleh, M. I.; Dini, D., et al.: Detection of proteoglycan loss from articular cartilage using Brillouin microscopy, with applications to osteoarthritis.Biomedical Optics Express: 10 (5), 2457, 2019.
20. Parfenov, V. A.; Khesuani, Y. D.; Petrov, S. V., et al.: Magnetic levitational bioassembly of 3D tissue construct in space.Science Advances: 6 (29), eaba4174, 2020.
About the Author:
William Harley graduated with honors in medical biotechnology from the University of New South Wales. Currently, he is undertaking a Ph.D. at the University of Melbourne in acoustophoretic bioprinting. Stemming from his research experience in biomaterials, stem cells, and nanofabrication, he is driven by the clinical translation of personalized regenerative medicine. He is passionate about the innovation of 3D printing in healthcare and is determined to orchestrate a series of 3D HEALS events to engage in the Australian community.