<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Product Liability : Biocompatible Materials in 3D Printed Products	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://3dheals.com/biocompatible-materials-in-3d-printed-products/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://3dheals.com/biocompatible-materials-in-3d-printed-products/</link>
	<description>Discover 3D Bioprinting and Healthcare Innovations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 19:12:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Pollack		</title>
		<link>https://3dheals.com/biocompatible-materials-in-3d-printed-products/#comment-189</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Pollack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://3dheals.com/?p=1456#comment-189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For clarity, a Class IIa material is a designation under EU standards.   That does not confer any regulatory stature to devices sold in the US.   Under FDA regulations, a dental splint is a Class II medical device (different that a Class IIA device under EU standards) and requires a 510(k) for legal marketing in the US.   To the best of my knowledge, no company has a materials cleared under 510(k) regulations for a 3D printed dental split.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For clarity, a Class IIa material is a designation under EU standards.   That does not confer any regulatory stature to devices sold in the US.   Under FDA regulations, a dental splint is a Class II medical device (different that a Class IIA device under EU standards) and requires a 510(k) for legal marketing in the US.   To the best of my knowledge, no company has a materials cleared under 510(k) regulations for a 3D printed dental split.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
